![]() |
|
Epistrophe (Eprepe) Journal of Professional Ethics in Philosophy and Education. Studies and Practices Revue d’Éthique Professionnelle en Philosophie et en Éducation. Études et Pratiques vol. 2, 2018-2019 ISSN:1234-5678-9000 |
Introductory Note |
pages 10-14 |
Christiane Gohier Pour une éthique du lien: les principales sources d’un cadre multiréférentiel |
pages 15-35 |
Louise Ferté Une éducation au dissensus face à l’universel moralA dissensual perspective for education facing moral universal |
pages 36-65 |
Luc Bégin Imagination morale et aveuglement moralMoral imagination and moral blindness |
pages 66-79 |
Eleni Kalokairinou Critical moral thinking or refinement of disposition?What is the aim of moral education? Raisonnement moral critique ou raffinement de la disposition? Qui est le but de l’éducation morale? |
pages 80-95 |
Jacques Quintin Une herméneutique de l’ignorance pour comprendre la relation médecin-patientA hermeneutics of ignorance to understand the relationship between doctor and patient |
pages 96-114 |
María José Carrasco Zavala Éthique professionnelle des enseignants et réalisation circulaire de soiProfessional ethics of teachers and circular self-realization |
pages 115-134 |
Isabel Baptista Ethical Knowledge and Teacher TrainingSavoir éthique et formation des enseignants |
pages 135-146 |
Andrea Potestio L'éducateur socio-pédagogique pour les services au travail. |
pages 147-159 |
Eirick Prairat The tact. Ethical virtue and educational know-how |
pages 160-179 |
Jean-François Dupeyron, Christophe Miqueu Ethique professionnelle enseignante, formation républicaine et autoritarisme néolibéralProfessional teacher ethics, Republican Training and neoliberal authoritarianism |
pages 180-211 |
Mohamed Miliani L’éthique universitaire professionnelle à l’épreuve du plagiat des enseignantsΤhe university professional ethics against the test of teachers' plagiarism |
pages 212-230 |
France Jutras, Jean Paul Ndoreraho La professionnalisation par un regroupement professionnel d’enseignants: l’exemple de l’Association québécoise d’enseignement moralProfessionalization by a professional grouping of teachers: the example of the Quebecois Association of moral teaching |
pages 231-254 |
Introductory Note In order to implement their sociopolitical goals, contemporary educational institutions in Europe do nοt resort at all to what they had been practicing for the last fifty years any more, namely, the «geist governing»[1]. It seems that the new mode of educator subjectification has definitively deviated from the paternalistic guidance of Higher Schools that provide a Continuing Professional Development, via university structures. The French paradigm is characteristic: the period of university institutions responsible for the continuing professional development of teachers in France (IUFM), has been a critical one, with a high degree of pedagogical and philosophical inventiveness, which, rapidly, however, came under the control of a neoliberal perspective of continuing professional development through the exposure of new educators to imperilments[2] that bring them face to face with risky situations without however having had prior mutual preparation within a professional community. As a result comes the massive profession commitment withdrawal and candidacy withdrawal from recruitment exams, the erosion of what we would continue to call «mission» against a secularized public service for the benefit of a profession bricolage without any other structure rather than that granted by the survival mechanisms as adopted by the institution, on an instructional pseudoscientific and ethical level[3]. Recent history on educators’ ongoing education in France has not only got a clarifying or incidental value; it also possesses a paradigmatic function in relation to the general unfolding movement of the hierarchical allocation of life skills which thereon we have to literally consider as abilities in bare life with the intention of arranging biopowers, according also to Foucault’s analysis. The studies on education have long since shown that school assessments or the ones corresponding to lifelong learning or vocational training had no more been aiming neither at conceptual intelligence nor at the ability of a rational and practical orientation within the world for which we are being educated, but rather at the ability of compliance with norms, endurance to tests that lack the initiation function; in a word, of consent to a certain degree of voluntary slavery associated with the social hierarchy. At the time of the fading of institutions, which succeeded the period of ’68 in the world, ongoing education seemed to correspond to the capacity of promoting a self-educating ability. But at the same time, the institutional authority collapsed through this same opening under the faded form of coaching and under the demand, according to which, each will have to become the «entrepreneur of himself / herself», so as to align oneself with the general expectations of the economic entities. The ethical question transformed into a claim of «ethical health», of extended precaution against evil and its private distortions which are added to the horizon of normative health. We have surely moved away from the desideratum of public or private morality that is associated with institutions of «geist governing», but the structure, as Karl Löwith has shown, remains unchanged, namely, that of the planning of the shift of spirit in order to gain salvation[4]. Against this demand for ethical precaution, the only way of resistance is the building of a certain individual morality that is formed by each educator himself/ herself. Ethical thought in education, if it constitutes a philosophical question, has a direct political risk which ought to produce results according to two temporalities. The first one, the long-term, is that of the education's horizon and of its programmed abandonment to the teaching and training’s markets. But the second one is calling us urgently: it is that of the actual situation in which practicing teachers are disorientated and made weak in their struggle; in the School, against the rise of segregations and the disavowal of accountability for the students' ability to think. Hence, the upgrowth of the ethical demand in School, has nothing to do with a return of morality and consensus; it is about a process aiming at a politics of the self that renders each and everyone responsible for his/her personal and collective commitment while exerting a liberty and while putting up resistance against dominion and non-critical compliance. Then, it is about raising again the question of the principal function of philosophy as an education of the self itself. The connection between education as an institution, the multiform practice of pedagogy within this very institution, the ethical and axiological parameter as critical parameters for the justification and legitimization (or delegitimization) of various systemic functions, philosophy and philosophical analysis- research, becomes vital: in other words, it is all about an explosive and devastating union due to the growing of opposing and complex forces from these practical and epistemological environments, which are often linked with difficulty. Bringing this connection to light, we would like to understand it through the prism of professional ethics, which in our judgement, becomes an actual laboratory for the identification and the philosophical processing of ethical questions that multiply (often urgently) within the educational act in all its levels: from the principles to objectives and aims, from criteriology to axiology, from theories to reasoning and arguments, from the classroom's micro-level to the macro-level of the institution and politics. The developing of the criterion and of the ethical judgement (something that refers to an education of judgement) seems to be perceived as a sine qua non of the developing of the pedagogical consciousness itself, as well as of the educational/institutional culture. However, philosophical analysis attempts to clarify (and abolish, overshadow or confirm) the categorizations, the criteria and the axioms of normative practical ethics, seen through social procedures, namely, through their mandatory nature as regulations that ought to create a common framework for the distinction and adoption of ways of practice. It is about an intensive propaedeutic which underlies self-reflection on theories and practices (so as to conceive the ethically ambiguous or the unacceptable). Teachers are called to examine ethical theories, principles and norms taking the risk and the benefit of their conflicting dynamic especially in the context of a professional deontology diffused and pressing (and often incomprehensible within its regulating logic). Their participation in the making of such an ethics could only be associated with their ability to constitute it actively and to defend it through a detailed observation of practice, a conscious and clarified overall estimation of thoughts and arguments in the perspective of reinforcing the principle of responsibility (individual and collective), commitment and self-regulation. It is this ability which the philosophical approach would want (in an effort to attenuate the institution's inherent consequences of authority), to awaken, to process and to support on account of the person (like an original project) within formal discourse, in so far also as the professional framework (or the order) is governed par excellence by parameters of heteronomy and depersonalization, which create conditions of adjustment to reality (an adjustment however which typically is not adequately processed). Parameters regarding the obvious or latent exercise of authority, obedience acts, disciplinary and monitoring acts, acts of required application to stated or unstated codes, rules and norms, the emphasis on excellence and expertise, the legal support (namely, with whatever seems to ensure professionalization at a first level). Therefore, ethical deliberation obsessively includes questions related to the limits, the determinations, the preferences, the demand for justice, the meaning of acts of ascribing value, the axiom of constant process of perfecting, the principle of relevance and suitability, values, beliefs and traditions, conflicts, judgment, family and religious ethics, personal ethics, the utopian element, in an effort to share with the community the meaning of actions. In this very context, the authors of this volume, try to put forward theories and concepts that delineate a professional ethics by giving emphasis to the different aspects of ethical approach of situations (s. «For an ethic of the bond: the main sources of a multireferential framework» by Christiane Gohier, «A dissensual perspective for education facing moral universal» by Louise Ferté, «Moral imagination and moral blindness» by Luc Bégin, «Critical moral thinking or refinement of disposition? What is the aim of moral education?», by Eleni Kalokairinou), to understand the relation with the other in a professional frame of accompaniment and the meaning of self- realization on the level of ethics within educational practice (s. «An hermeneutics of ignorance to understand the relationship between doctor and patient» by Jacques Quintin and «Professional ethics of teachers and circular self-realization» by María José Carrasco Zavala), to discuss the role of ethical knowledge of teachers as a substantial element of their «professional profile», analyze the specific competences and rules that constitutes the function of the socio-pedagogical educator acting in the field of employment services («The socio-pedagogical educator for the services at work. A reflection on the Italian context» by Andrea Potestio) and reflect upon the concept of tact becoming a major pedagogical competence for the relational professions (s. «Ethical Knowledge and Teacher Training» by Isabel Baptista and «The tact. Ethical virtue and educational know-how» by Eirick Prairat), to explore the teaching professional ethics through the critical study of notions, thematic and phenomena like «education of citizenship» within neoliberalism, the plagiarism of professors in the frame of university education or the professionalization and the professional responsibility (s. «Professional teacher ethics, Republican Training and neoliberal authoritarianism» by Jean-François Dupeyron & Christophe Miqueu and «Τhe university professional ethics against the test of teachers' plagiarism», by Mohamed Miliani, and «Professionalization by a professional grouping of teachers: the example of the Quebecois Association of moral teaching» by France Jutras & Jean Paul Ndoreraho). Thus, one can realize that the movement of a possible understanding of professional ethics is crossed and crossing, encompassed and encompassing, sustained & sustaining, accompanied & accompanying vis-à-vis all aspects & folds of ethical phenomenon & acts in function with the educational phenomenon & acts during their ambiguous encounter with the profession: a whole depth, a whole breadth & many junctions.
Elena Theodoropoulou, Didier Moreau Oct.-Dec. 2019
[1] According to François Guizot'; Cf. Nique, C., François Guizot, l’École au service du gouvernement des esprits, Paris: Hachette, 2000. [2] Cf. Beck, U., La société du risque, Paris: Aubier, 2001. [3] In this way, we can watch the French ministerial imposition of archaic reading methods in contradiction with the principle of pedagogical freedom, which has been conceded by Jules Ferry against the clergy's attacks, the praising promotion of cognitive sciences and the flooding of professional ethics by palliative ethics, the only ones capable of supporting educators under training from the minute they enter the profession. [4] Löwith, K., Histoire et salut, Paris: Gallimard, 2002. |
|||||
![]() |
Abstract: In its simplest meaning, ethics is about caring for others while respecting oneself. Several authors have fed my reflection on an ethics of relationship. Among these, Buber who proposes a dialogal relationship between theI and Thou. However, it is Ricoeur who has best thematized the relationship of reciprocity with each other. Self-attestation, solicitude for the others and mutual recognition form what I have called the trilogy of the ethical circle that explains the emergence of the ethical subject. Habermas’ discourse ethics is another element of this frame of reference, adding to its procedural dimension Honneth’s intersubjective relationships of recognition. Finally, moral imagination and empathy, as thematized by Nussbaum, complete this summary of a reflexive course. |
|
Κeywords: ethics of relationship, dialogue, discussion, recognition, empathy. |
Abstract: The phenomenon of moral blindness, increasingly studied by moral psychology and cognitive sciences, is of interest to ethics applied to organizations and institutions. This phenomenon presents itself as a limitation of the moral imagination capacities of actors in situations. What are the causes of this weakness of moral imagination? How can it be understood and distinguished from other similar phenomena? Should we attribute full responsibility for it to moral agents? And what means can be used to counter this blindness and restore moral imagination, the essential source of well-conducted moral deliberation? These questions are addressed from a perspective of conceptual clarification and identification of practical issues that affect organizations. |
|
Keywords: moral blindness, moral imagination, applied ethics, weakness of will. |
Abstract: This essay try to analyze the specific competences and rules that constitutes the function of the socio-pedagogical educator acting in the field of employment services. Indeed, the educator in the employment services can become the professional figure able to highlight, in certain contexts, the links between the manual act and the reflexivity, the concrete and the abstraction, thus allowing the promotion, in an integral way, skills of workers, experts and novices. |
Download Full article here |
Keywords: Educator, pedagogy, skills, work. | ![]() |